MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist

From Wikiafripedia, the free encyclopedia that you can monetize your contributions or browse at zero-rating.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Mediawiki:Spam-blacklist is meant to be used by the spam blacklist extension. Unlike the meta spam blacklist, this blacklist affects pages on the English Wikiafripedia only. Any administrator may edit the spam blacklist. See Wikiafripedia:Spam blacklist for more information about the spam blacklist.

Instructions for editors

There are 4 sections for posting comments below. Please make comments in the appropriate section. These links take you to the appropriate section:

  1. Proposed additions
  2. Proposed removals
  3. Troubleshooting and problems
  4. Discussion

Each section has a message box with instructions. In addition, please sign your posts with ~~~~ after your comment.

Completed requests are archived. All additions and removals are also logged.

Instructions for admins

Any admin unfamiliar with this page should probably read this first, thanks.
If in doubt, please leave a request and a spam-knowledgeable admin will follow-up.

  1. Does the site have any validity to the project?
  2. Have links been placed after warnings/blocks? Have other methods of control been exhausted? Would referring this to our anti-spam bot, XLinkBot be a more appropriate step? Is there a WikiProject Spam report? If so, a permanent link would be helpful.
  3. Please ensure all links have been removed from articles and discussion pages before blacklisting. (They do not have to be removed from user or user talk pages).
  4. Make the entry at the bottom of the list (before the last line). Please do not do this unless you are familiar with regex — the disruption that can be caused is substantial.
  5. Close the request entry on here using either {{done}} or {{not done}} as appropriate. The request should be left open for a week maybe as there will often be further related sites or an appeal in that time.
  6. Log the entry. Warning: if you do not log any entry you make on the blacklist, it may well be removed if someone appeals and no valid reasons can be found. To log the entry, you will need this number - 45841 after you have closed the request. See here for more info on logging.
snippet for logging: {{/request|45841#section_name}}
snippet for logging of WikiProject Spam items: {{WAPSPAM|45841#section_name}}

Proposed additions[edit source][edit source]

Being used in 123Movies, seems to be a piracy site. Special:Diff/919718463, Special:Diff/919571937, Special:Diff/919566402, etc. --Majavah (t/c) 10:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

@Majavah: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:51, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[edit source]

Being spammed by multiple IP addresses. Ravensfire (talk) 00:36, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

@Ravensfire: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:10, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[edit source]

It's a personal website belonging to an individual (claiming to be "Sir Knight Dr Anton Anderssen, Lord of Hartforth" on social networking sites and CV sites on the 'Net) who makes false claims about having a British noble title, "Lord Hartforth", a title that doesn't exist, and then apparently using that to scam people in the US. Links to the site, along with the false claims about the title, have been added regularly to articles here for more than ten years now, primarily to Hartforth and Anderssen, being swiftly added back again every time it's removed (see recent page history of Hartforth). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 14:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Thomas.W, Did any of the social networking sites get added as well? If so, which? —Dirk Beetstra T C 18:10, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
I haven't seen any of the other sites being added here, I found them when doing a search on the name of the person, when trying to figure out what this was all about. When doing some research here on WAP I also found accusations about the fake title being actively used for scamming people. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 18:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
@Thomas.W: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 19:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[edit source]

Continued spamming of a likely copyright-violating download site after multiple warnings and an initial short-time block (now indeffed). Should be an obvious case, but a second pair of eyes double-checking the situation would be great to be sure. GermanJoe (talk) 12:32, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

@GermanJoe: this may have to go to meta, but you have my blessing to blacklist it here. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:38, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
@GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --GermanJoe (talk) 12:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Woo-hoo! Your first blacklist addition! Congrats to GermanJoe, our newest spam wrangler! Guy (help!) 16:08, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
GermanJoe, he even found the script ... (take care, it has quirks, check if all is fine). --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:19, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[edit source]

A seem personal blog like "news/current affair website" was spammed by the user. Google search show no hit, but echo of contributions of the user at Twitter (using Sajjadkazmi946), Instagram and Facebook (using the name "Political Uprising"). Wikiafripedia is not place to promote start-up news website. Special:Diff/920754286, Special:Diff/920755723, Special:Diff/920757508. Matthew hk (talk) 17:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

@Matthew hk:  Declined, lets first see if the message gets through now, or after a block. --Dirk Beetstra T C 18:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[edit source]

This isn't the first IP/user I've seen WAP:REFSPAMming links to this site in this way. I didn't record the others (but I can in future), but I've reverted almost identical WAP:REFSPAM from at least half a dozen other IP/users in the last month or two. There may, I suppose, be occasions where this is a valid source for a reference, and there are, I know, existing links but I haven't seen any occasions where it's an irreplaceable, reliable source, and this is a campaign to use us to drive traffic to the site, imo. -- Begoon 09:32, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

plus Added to User:XLinkBot/RevertList. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:44, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
@XLinkBot/RevertList: plus Added to User:XLinkBot/RevertReferencesList. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. -- Begoon 12:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Beetstra, should [1] have therefore been bot-reverted? Or was I just too quick for the bot? If the latter then I'll leave any more I notice on my watchlist for a while to give the bot a chance... -- Begoon 12:08, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Begoon, I'll have to check, bot had hickups lately. Dirk Beetstra T C 14:09, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Ok thanks. It looks like the bot reverted one of's contributions - [2]. I've done the others now. Cheers. -- Begoon 14:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
I just noticed this, so it seems to be working. -- Begoon 04:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

This starts to be annoying:

All SPAs, same MO as previous IPs. It looks a bit strange to me that this is zoominfo themselves promoting ... (@Begoon:, maybe time for a RS/N to see if this is even usable?). --Dirk Beetstra T C 06:21, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Beetstra, there seem to be a couple of hundred existing links in article space (unless I messed up my search parameters). As I said above, I've not really seen a case where it's essential, and they are a commercial company who makes money out of selling access to their database, so I'm not sure. Joe job? Perhaps, but a pretty determined one if that's the case - and for what reason? Big time investment for a competitor or an ex-employee with a grudge, I'd have thought - but who knows... The Ips above all geolocate to India, but I guess the fact that someone might be outsourcing spamming shouldn't be too surprising. -- Begoon 06:32, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
@Begoon: I have a VPN, I can be everywhere in Europe, IP addresses are difficult things, and indeed, there are some countries where there seem to be a lot of sweatshops doing stuff. Joe jobbers tend to be just as persistent as spammers. XLinkBot does a decent job, but as you said, there are hundreds of links there, it may be good to investigate whether it is an idea to clean up and blacklist. (other option, EditFilter before XLinkBot). --Dirk Beetstra T C 06:37, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Ok - I'll put it at RSN, see what others think. -- Begoon 06:40, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Beetstra, Wikiafripedia:Reliable_sources/ Cheers. -- Begoon 06:54, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[edit source]

User keeps posting link to page and seems to attach their user name to the end of the link. Probably an account trying to share personal link to gain on IFCO. AmericanAir88(talk) 17:44, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

@AmericanAir88: thankyou for reporting this, but  Declined, I see only one addition and the user is blocked. If this persists on multiple accounts we will reconsider this. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[edit source]

IP has been persistently adding this link to various music articles. Link is being used repeatedly as a non-RS source to back various OR claims as well as being added to various external link lists. This has been ongoing since 2017. This was originally posted on WAP:ANI here. Blackmane (talk) 04:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

@Blackmane: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 16:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[edit source]

A new website directly related to "Pastor Isaiah Ogedegbe" (see deletion log, and that's only one of the many names the same promo-piece has been created as) and his globally blacklisted "". See these edits adding the new website on Warri. The new user account has been reported as an obvious sock of User:Vwegba4real. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 16:07, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

@Thomas.W: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 05:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[edit source]

Nigerian "careers website" that is being repeatedly added to articles about Nigerian government agencies etc. Sample edits: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 19:24, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

@Thomas.W: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 05:09, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[edit source]

Slow-motion spamming of "research report" links into articles on chemical topics. Activity has continued via IPs since Research Report Kart (talk · contribs) was blocked and notified. -- The Anome (talk) 09:20, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

@The Anome: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist - obvious "research" spammer, initial block has been ignored. --GermanJoe (talk) 09:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! -- The Anome (talk) 10:27, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Cspathway[edit source]

Racked up a spam4 quite fast. Waiting for further reports. --Dirk Beetstra T C 09:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

@Beetstra: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed removals[edit source]

Logging / COIBot Instructions[edit source]

Blacklist logging

Full Instructions for Admins

Quick Reference

For Spam reports or requests originating from this page, use template {{/request|0#section_name}}

  • {{/request|213416274#Section_name}}
  • Insert the oldid 213416274 a hash "#" and the Section_name (Underscoring_spaces_where_applicable):
  • Use within the entry log here.

For Spam reports or requests originating from Wikiafripedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam use template {{WAPSPAM|0#section_name}}

  • {{WAPSPAM|182725895#Section_name}}
  • Insert the oldid 182725895 a hash "#" and the Section_name (Underscoring_spaces_where_applicable):
  • Use within the entry log here.
Note: if you do not log your entries it may be removed if someone appeals and no valid reasons can be found.

Addition to the COIBot reports

The lower list in the COIBot reports now have after each link four numbers between brackets (e.g. " (0, 0, 0, 0)"):

  1. first number, how many links did this user add (is the same after each link)
  2. second number, how many times did this link get added to wikipedia (for as far as the linkwatcher database goes back)
  3. third number, how many times did this user add this link
  4. fourth number, to how many different wikipedia did this user add this link.

If the third number or the fourth number are high with respect to the first or the second, then that means that the user has at least a preference for using that link. Be careful with other statistics from these numbers (e.g. good user who adds a lot of links). If there are more statistics that would be useful, please notify me, and I will have a look if I can get the info out of the database and report it. This data is available in real-time on IRC.

poking COIBot

When adding {{LinkSummary}}, {{UserSummary}} and/or {{IPSummary}} templates to WT:WAPSPAM, WT:SBL, WT:SWL and User:COIBot/Poke (the latter for priviliged editors) COIBot will generate linkreports for the domains, and userreports for users and IPs.

Discussion[edit source][edit source]

Shouldn't this edit have been blocked, based on the existing pattern \\/jinnylimkeen\/videos\/10154591345794635\/\b. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 19:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

AlanM1, no, the link misses the trailing / ... I’ll try to fix it later if noone else beats me to removing the last \/ Dirk Beetstra T C 03:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
AlanM1 I have truncated to \\/jinnylimkeen\/videos\/10154591345794635. Next step is to just take out the whole facebook account with prejudice to taking out all others that then are used to circumvent. --Dirk Beetstra T C 05:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

1920 Akron Pros season[edit source]

I tried to restore a citation ("NFL History (March 10, 2003)") to this article that was removed a few years ago, it seems, because the archived URL was not working. The archived URL is working now, but the underlying URL leads to a malicious website; I thus can't add it to the "url=" parameter, even with a "url-status=dead" parameter. Accordingly, the archived URL will not display. Does anyone have any suggestions of how to resolve this? Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 03:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

@Usernameunique: Defer to Whitelist for the specific link. We'll have a look. Do post the link (you may need to break it or nowiki it. --Dirk Beetstra T C 04:29, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, Beetstra. Do you mean I should ask about the link at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist? The archived live, which is fine, is (note the insertion of "BREAK" in the middle) — the original link, however (which you can see at the end of the archived link) appears to lead to a malicious redirect. --Usernameunique (talk) 04:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Usernameunique, yes, this may be best solved through whitelisting. I guess now that this is collateral damage caused by the influx of sport merchandise spam (whole sets of sites with ‘nfl’ in the name. We’ll investigate there. —Dirk Beetstra T C 05:54, 11 October 2019 (UTC)